<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: HARP 2.0 applications to officially begin December 1st	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.governmentrefinanceassistance.com/the-homeowner-affordability-and-stability-plan/harp-2-0-applications-to-officially-begin-december-1st/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.governmentrefinanceassistance.com/the-homeowner-affordability-and-stability-plan/harp-2-0-applications-to-officially-begin-december-1st/</link>
	<description>Information and Updates on Government Mortgage Programs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 05:27:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: RDRay		</title>
		<link>https://www.governmentrefinanceassistance.com/the-homeowner-affordability-and-stability-plan/harp-2-0-applications-to-officially-begin-december-1st/#comment-45974</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RDRay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 02:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentrefinanceassistance.com/?p=1780#comment-45974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why does HARP 2.0 not apply to 2nd mortgages on a home that is underwater?

If a unit appraised at $465K prior to the housing bubble now valued at &#060;$200K, with a combined outstanding mortgage of $334K, why can&#039;t a mtge company under HARP blend the two rates on the $334K at a reasonable rate and restructure the two loans into one.  Under this formula the financier does not lose anything, in fact they gain.  Help us understand the &#034;illogic&#034;, aside from the willingness to ignore those who continue to pay on what they now deem as undervalued property?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does HARP 2.0 not apply to 2nd mortgages on a home that is underwater?</p>
<p>If a unit appraised at $465K prior to the housing bubble now valued at &lt;$200K, with a combined outstanding mortgage of $334K, why can&#039;t a mtge company under HARP blend the two rates on the $334K at a reasonable rate and restructure the two loans into one.  Under this formula the financier does not lose anything, in fact they gain.  Help us understand the &quot;illogic&quot;, aside from the willingness to ignore those who continue to pay on what they now deem as undervalued property?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
